[Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology]. / Recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico e informe anatomopatológico de los tumores neuroendocrinos hipofisarios. Consenso de expertos de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinologia y Nutrición y de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology. / Recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico e informe anatomopatológico de los tumores neuroendocrinos hipofisarios. Consenso de expertos de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinologia y Nutrición y de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

Proposal of a clinically relevant working classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors based on pituitary transcription factors.

The immunohistochemistry (IHC) characterization of pituitary transcription factors (PTFs) PIT1, TPIT, and SF1, which enable the identification of three different adenohypophyseal cell lines, has been incorporated into the latest classification system of the World Health Organization (WHO) for pituitary adenomas. This change overturns the concept of the adenoma as solely a hormone producer and classifies these tumors based on their cell lineage. The aim of the study was to provide a diagnostic algorithm, based on IHC expression of hypophyseal hormones with potential use in diagnostic practice, contributing to an improved classification of pituitary adenomas. Our sample included 146 pituitary adenomas previously classified based on hormonal subtypes by IHC (former 2004 WHO criteria) and re-evaluated after the IHC quantification of PIT1, TPIT, and SF1 expression, under WHO 2017 recommendations. We assessed the correlation between expression of PTFs and the classification as per hormonal IHC and correlated clinicopathological profiles based on PTFs. The IHC study of PTFs allowed reclassification of 82% of tumors that were negative for all pituitary hormones, with 21 positive cases for SF1 (reclassified as gonadotroph tumors), 1 positive case for TPIT (reclassified as a corticotroph tumor), and 4 positive cases for PIT1. Using SF1 enabled detection of a substantial portion of gonadotroph tumors, reducing the estimated prevalence of null cell tumors to less than 5%, and identification of plurihormonal pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with PIT1-SF1 coexpression and hormone-negative PIT1s, a group in which we did not observe differences in the clinical behavior compared with the rest of the tumors of the same cell lineage.Our results suggest that applying a diagnostic algorithm based on the study of PTFs could contribute to improving the classification of pituitary adenomas. By adding TPIT assessment, we propose a two-step algorithm, with hypophyseal hormones being used in a selective modality, depending on initial results.

Spontaneous Regression of Primary Thyroid Lymphoma: Two Rarities at the Same Time.

Primary thyroid lymphomas are pretty uncommon, and constitute about 5% of the neoplasms of this organ. Spontaneous tumor regression is defined as the total or partial disappearance of a tumor as proven by microscope without treatment or under inadequate treatment. It is estimated to happen in one out of 60,000-100,000 cases. We present a case of primary thyroid lymphoma with spontaneous regression after diagnostic puncture and corroborated with hemithyroidectomy at four months. The patient died after twenty-six months of follow-up because of endocarditis and there was no relapse at any time.

Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica sobre biomarcadores en cáncer de mama / Consensus statement on biomarkers in breast cancer by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

En este consenso se revisan y actualizan las recomendaciones para el uso de biomarcadores en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama, de forma conjunta con la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica (SEAP) y la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM). Este grupo de expertos recomienda determinar en todos los casos de cáncer de mama el grado histológico, los receptores de estrógeno (RE)-alfa, los receptores de progesterona, el Ki-67 y el HER2 para evaluar el pronóstico y establecer las opciones terapéuticas, incluyendo hormonoterapia, quimioterapia y tratamiento anti-HER2. En las pacientes con RE-positivos y ganglios negativos se puede realizar una de las cuatro plataformas genéticas disponibles (MammaPrint®, Oncotype DX®, Prosigna® o EndoPredict®) para establecer una categoría de pronóstico y decidir con la paciente si el tratamiento adyuvante puede limitarse a la hormonoterapia. Las tecnologías más recientes, como la secuenciación de nueva generación, la biopsia líquida, la determinación de linfocitos infiltrados en el tumor o la determinación de PD-1, están por ahora en fase experimental (AU)

This consensus statement is a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). It revises and updates the recommendations for the use of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. The group of experts recommends that, in all cases of breast cancer, the histologic grade and the alpha-estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, Ki-67 and HER2 status should be determined, in order to assist prognosis and establish therapeutic options, including hormone therapy, chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy. One of the four available genetic prognostic platforms (MammaPrint®, Oncotype DX®, Prosigna® or EndoPredict®) may be used in node-negative ER-positive patients to establish a prognostic category and decide, together with the patient, whether adjuvant treatment be limited to hormonal therapy. Newer technologies, including next generation sequencing, liquid biopsy, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes or PD-1 determination, are still investigational (AU)

[Consensus statement on biomarkers in breast cancer by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology]. / Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica sobre biomarcadores en cáncer de mama.

This consensus statement is a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). It revises and updates the recommendations for the use of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. The group of experts recommends that, in all cases of breast cancer, the histologic grade and the alpha-estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, Ki-67 and HER2 status should be determined, in order to assist prognosis and establish therapeutic options, including hormone therapy, chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy. One of the four available genetic prognostic platforms (MammaPrint®, Oncotype DX®, Prosigna® or EndoPredict®) may be used in node-negative ER-positive patients to establish a prognostic category and decide, together with the patient, whether adjuvant treatment be limited to hormonal therapy. Newer technologies, including next generation sequencing, liquid biopsy, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes or PD-1 determination, are still investigational.

[Should we try to determine the specific cause of cardiac tamponade?]. / 'Debemos pensar en una etiología específica en pacientes con taponamiento cardíaco?

INTRODUCTION: The causes of cardiac tamponade vary and it has been suggested that underlying causes should be sought in all cases. The purpose of this study was to determine the causes of cardiac tamponade in our environment, distinguishing between specific and idiopathic causes, and analyzing the proportion and causes in the subgroup of patients with relapsing tamponade. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent therapeutic pericardiocentesis between 1985 and 2001. The clinical and radiographic features and macroscopic characteristics of the pericardial fluid were analyzed. The final diagnosis in each patient was based on the clinical history, follow-up, pericardial fluid cytology, and pericardial biopsy, if available. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included (52 men/44 women), mean age 56.1 16.1 years. The cause of pericardial effusion was neoplasm in 50 patients (52.1%), 14 idiopathic pericarditis (14.6%), 12 renal failure (12.5%), 7 iatrogenic cases (7.3%), 4 mechanical tamponades (4.2%), 2 tuberculosis (2.1%), and 7 other causes (7.3%). Thirty-five patients had relapsing tamponade; only 2 of them had idiopathic pericarditis (5.7%). We found no significant differences in age, development time, extracted volume or fluid features between tamponade of specific or idiopathic origin. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the cardiac tamponades in our series had a specific cause. This made it necessary to identify a specific underlying cause in each case, especially in relapsing effusions. However, we did not find any variable suggestive of the cause of the disease.

¿Debemos pensar en una etiología específica en pacientes con taponamiento cardíaco? / Should we try to determine the specific cause of cardiac tamponade?

Introducción. La etiología del taponamiento cardíaco es muy diversa, por lo que se ha planteado la necesidad de realizar un cribado de la posible causa subyacente en todos los casos. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar las causas del taponamiento en nuestro medio, distinguiendo entre específicas e idiopáticas, así como analizar la proporción y la etiología del subgrupo de taponamientos recidivantes.Pacientes y método. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes tratados con pericardiocentesis terapéutica entre 1985 y 2001. Se recogieron las características clínicas, radiológicas y macroscópicas del líquido extraído en cada caso. El diagnóstico etiológico se basó en datos de la historia clínica, evolución, citología del líquido pericárdico y biopsia, si se disponía de ésta.Resultados. Se incluyeron a 96 pacientes (52 varones y 44 mujeres; edad media 56,1 ñ 16,1 años). La etiología fue en 50 pacientes neoplásica (52,1 por ciento); en 14, idiopática (14,6 por ciento); en 12, urémica (12,5 por ciento); en 7, iatrogénica (7,3 por ciento), en 4, mecánica (4,2 por ciento); en 2, tuberculosa (2,1 por ciento); y en 7 (7,3 por ciento) otras causas. En 35 pacientes el taponamiento recidivó; de ellos, sólo dos presentaban una pericarditis idiopática (5,7 por ciento). No encontramos diferencias significativas en cuanto a la edad del paciente, el tiempo de evolución, el volumen extraído o las características del líquido, entre los taponamientos debidos a una pericarditis idiopática o a etiologías específicas.Conclusiones. La mayoría de los taponamientos cardíacos de nuestra serie presentan una etiología específica. Esto obliga a descartar una causa subyacente en todo taponamiento, especialmente en los casos de recidiva. Sin embargo, no encontramos ninguna variable que nos oriente hacia la etiología del cuadro (AU)